<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wage Stagnation - In Pictures.</title>
	<link>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/</link>
	<description>spelunking the interweb since late 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Wage Stagnation - In Pictures. by: Nicolai Brown</title>
		<link>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/#comment-9040</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/#comment-9040</guid>
					<description>It looks like stagnation only if you ignore women's wages.

Look again.  The blue line shows a steady increase in women's wages -- at a higher rate than the stagnating men's wages.  Overall, should one then conclude that wages are increasing?

It seems to me there is some faulty data out there.  This graph doesn't jive with other information out there, which actually _does_ show stagnating wages.  I'm inclined to believe wages are, in fact, stagnating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>
<p>It looks like stagnation only if you ignore women&#8217;s wages.</p></p>
	<p>
<p>Look again.  The blue line shows a steady increase in women&#8217;s wages&#8212;at a higher rate than the stagnating men&#8217;s wages.  Overall, should one then conclude that wages are increasing?</p></p>
	<p>
<p>It seems to me there is some faulty data out there.  This graph doesn&#8217;t jive with other information out there, which actually <em>does</em> show stagnating wages.  I&#8217;m inclined to believe wages are, in fact, stagnating.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Wage Stagnation - In Pictures. by: pdx</title>
		<link>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/#comment-7373</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/#comment-7373</guid>
					<description>I will award you a special prize if you can find a Congressional and Executive Branch pay raise graph to compare that to. 

It's worth remembering that Russ Feingold has worked to put a stop to the cush, automatic pay increases Congress receives. More on that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/6/27/123756/102&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;here&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>
<p>I will award you a special prize if you can find a Congressional and Executive Branch pay raise graph to compare that to. </p></p>
	<p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth remembering that Russ Feingold has worked to put a stop to the cush, automatic pay increases Congress receives. More on that <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/6/27/123756/102" rel="nofollow"><b>here</b></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Wage Stagnation - In Pictures. by: pstans</title>
		<link>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/#comment-7270</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaunderground.com/blog/2006/07/11/wage-stagnation-in-pictures/#comment-7270</guid>
					<description>That is a graph, not a picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>
<p>That is a graph, not a picture.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
